Socialism Rules: Not the Change We Need
Thomas Sowell, have I told you lately that I love you? Your rhetoric vs. record comments rock my world. And, Sarah, you continue to rock my world with your freshness and your honesty in the midst of all I have discovered about Sen. Barack Obama, his minions, activities, and supporters.
Is America about to be taken over by a corrupt political organization with a socialist ideology and ties to ACORN and the New Party, which my evidence showed Mr. Obama joined despite his denials? Mr. Obama rewrote his life history so he would be more acceptable to mainstream America. And, yes, we are all being sucked in. (The best example I can present is that the New Party purged Mr. Obama’s mention in about 2003 when he first surged on the national American scene, but the Wayback Machine doesn’t lie.) Too bad Sen. John McCain is not a better deceiver. This would be a railroad election.
Let’s look at a future in which Democrats control the House, the Senate and the presidency. In case you have forgotten, I don’t like neoconservatives, and I’m not a cheerleader for the Pres. George W. Bush legacies that violate my conservative values. But I am seriously concerned about what lies in our future as a nation.
The Wall Street Journal Opinion page has done yeoman’s duty and identified the key changes and policies that are likely to occur if Washington is controlled by Democrats. Collecting signatures to unionize workplaces by thug methodology undermines a cornerstone of a free society. Removal of the freedom to vote one’s conscience is likely as the Democrats repay unions for their support. But, what’s a little thug methodology to an 11-year campaign that has practiced it from the start?
Taxes will rise substantially. Nationalized health care alone will dramatically change both the quality of the services and the taxes the “rich” pay in America. What will American receive in return? Rationed, poor quality health-care protection. Small business and employers will see higher taxes. Forget the couple thousand dollars Mr. Obama wants to return to business owners when they hire an employee. The business people I know laughed out loud at his proposal.
Mr. Obama’s “rich,” who it turns out are the small businesses who employ the majority of America’s workforce, and whose wealth he wants to redistribute, are beginning to look to a Democratic administration for a future of taxation, regulation, and little influence.
Some conservative bloggers have suggested that it’s time for productive people to go “John Gault.”
In preparation for when the looters, er the Dems, er the socialists, take over Washington, employers have options. They can:
- Slow their growth by freezing hiring and thus limit the taxes they’d have to pay. Spend their former productive time with their families hiking, sunset watching, playing golf, and pursuing other personal interests.
- Layoff existing staff to substantially lower business costs and overhead. This would also limit taxation.
- Stop personal philanthropy and corporate social responsibility programs. (After all – the government’s going to do it for them – and do it better. Ha.)
- Stop spending. They’ll likely need the money later as the liberals bankrupt health-care systems, social security, and Medicare the way they did Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Trust me they’ll find a way. The Community Reinvestment Act and subprime mortgages are a taste of our financial future.
- Take their money out of the investment system. Keep it in a safe. They won’t see the value disappear even if it never growd. (Oh, but that’s probably wrong; the money presses will be running full time to pay for liberal initiatives.) So, it’s better to invest in hard goods like gold, precious metals, and ammunition that have intrinsic value and that won’t vanish in a politician’s moment.
There will be more. With a Democratic Washington, we’ll need to be prepared and ever vigilant. The conservative values that created a great nation steadily deteriorated during the Clinton administration and the Bush administration. I expect that deterioration to accelerate during a Democratic administration.
Daniel, you asked this morning about Gen. Colin Powell? I had hoped he would remain above the fray. He chose not to. It was a moving speech. I am not a person who does a lot of name calling and I have never believed that Mr. Obama is a Muslim, nor do I believe it would be a problem if he were. Nor do I believe Sen. John McCain is an erratic old man as Mr. Obama and the liberal press would have us believe. Nor do I believe that Mr. Powell’s decision was all about race, as some commentators are saying.
Both campaigns have done their share of mudslinging. Like you said, elections get ugly. For me, though, this election has always been about the issues. Even when I have written about associations, the bottom line has always been the issue that the association represented.
We are veering as a nation hard left and I don’t think many Americans know this yet. Still more don’t care. Others sit around kitchen tables talking with friends about how it’s good to be a socialist because it means they’re helping people. But, it looks as if we may get the change America doesn't need. And, I kinda lost a hero last night.
This week's previous posts (most recent first): Socialism Rules, The Politics of Destruction
Comments
Little Red Riding Wolfowitz
A Word About Cronyism
While we are busy with elections and the economy and loosing our homes, still president Bush has been quietly still busy. Doing…..what? Wolfowitz. The Buck Really Did Stop With That Guy. What ever happened to Wolfowitz? He sold us the war in Iraq as a two second venture, then went to the World Bank and was almost the first President to be fired by said bank. Now this same Wolfowitz who sheepishly slunk out of the limelight for most of this year is the same Wolfowitz to lead Bush’s New International Security Advisory Board. Wolfowitz, sort of sounds like a Nazi name, don’t you think? How is he qualified for this position? And what is this board to do? To give our government advice on Weapons of Mass Destruction. On his first day up, he recommends spending money on nukes to keep us competitive with the damn Communists, Red China. Now. In this economic climate????? Is he kidding?????
Salon
May 14, 2007 (Flashback)
The executive board of the World Bank mulled a possible vote of no confidence in the leadership of its president, Paul Wolfowitz, this weekend. How did the renowned neoconservative and former deputy secretary of defense, a primary architect of the Iraq war, come to these straits? Is he, as he claims, the victim of a smear campaign by those who dislike his politics? Or do the charges of favoritism and nepotism reflect genuine character flaws?
The small morality play unfolding at the World Bank tells us something significant about how the United States became bogged down in the Iraq quagmire when Wolfowitz was highly influential at the Department of Defense. The simple fact is that Wolfowitz has throughout his entire career demonstrated a penchant for cronyism and for smearing and marginalizing perceived rivals as tactics for getting his way. He has been arrogant and highhanded in dismissing the views of wiser and more informed experts, exhibiting a narcissism that is also apparent in his personal life. Indeed, these tactics are typical of what might be called the “neoconservative style.”
Soon after becoming head of the World Bank, Wolfowitz lapsed into his typical favoritism, even while he was, ironically, decrying the technique as practiced by governments of the global South. Instead of having an open search for some key positions and allowing for promotions from within, Wolfowitz simply installed Republicans from the Bush administration in high positions with enormous salaries. He brought Kevin Kellems from Dick Cheney’s office (where he had been communications director) and gave him a tax-free salary said to have been as high as $250,000 a year. As Wolfowitz’s new senior advisory, Kellems was leap-frogged over hundreds of officials with serious credentials in development work, something about which he knew little. When representing Cheney, Kellems went to great lengths to defend the vice president’s implausible conspiracy theory linking Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden.
Another controversial Wolfowitz appointment was Robin Cleveland, whom he made his assistant. She had been an aide to Sen. Mitch McConnell and then associate director of the White House Office of Management and Budget . She had been implicated in a corruption and nepotism scandal at the Pentagon, but the Department of Defense had determined it did not have jurisdiction to investigate her. In 2003, while at the OMB, she had lobbied then Secretary of the Air Force James Roche to get her brother a job at defense contractor Northrop Grumman, where Roche had been an executive. Though, like Kellems, she lacked experience in international development, she also received a reported quarter of a million dollars a year in compensation at the World Bank. And also like Kellems, she is alleged to have been an abrasive and abusive boss.
Wolfowitz appointee Juan José Daboub quietly began changing World Bank policy on contraception,presumably as a favor to the Bush administration, which depends heavily on the Christian right for support. Daboub, who had been close to the right-wing government of El Salvador, ordered all references to family planning removed from a strategy document for Madagascar. Bank officials were said by the Financial Times to have been afraid that the World Bank’s long-standing focus on contraception in forestalling disease was being changed by Daboub, and that poor women would suffer as a result. When the story surfaced, Wolfowitz told National Public Radio that the bank had made no changes in policy on contraceptives. Experienced, high-level World Bank officials began resigning in droves as they saw Wolfowitz institute a reign of cronies with little development experience and massive salaries. The management style of the newcomers, cliquish among themselves and harsh toward outsiders, alienated those who remained.
None of these appointments, however unpopular, proved Wolfowitz’s undoing. It was the provisions he made for his girlfriend, Shaha Ali Riza, that finally blew up in his face. She had been working at the bank since the late 1990s, and the two had become involved when she divorced her husband and he became estranged from his wife. Wolfowitz made his relationship with Riza public when it became clear Bush would nominate Wolfowitz to head the bank. Bank ethics rules did not allow him to oversee a lover and set her salary, though he initially insisted that he could recuse himself from such decisions while functioning as her superior. The bank’s ethics officials said no to this proposed arrangement. He then had her transferred to the Near Eastern Affairs Bureau of the State Department to work with Elizabeth Cheney, the daughter of the vice president. He arranged such extraordinary salary increases for her that she ended up being better paid than Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.
World Bank Group Association, which represents the institution’s 13,000 employees, sent around a memo pointing out that the pay raises received by Riza were twice what bank rules allowed.Charges of nepotism and corruption flew. Then renewed attention was given to a 2003 incident in which Douglas Feith, at the time Wolfowitz’s deputy, had briefly detailed Riza to a Defense Department contractor as a consultant on Iraq democratization, and arranged for her to receive $17,000 for a month’s worth of work.
(Thus George W. Bush, the 43rd Still President of The United States allowed completely non competent people into the group of Consultants on Iraq Democratization AND YET, he just signed an Executive Order to seize all property with NO NOTICE of anyone who should be found to “threaten stability in Iraq.” And this same man, this man who encouraged, placed, arranged, transfered, and oversaw the career of said woman who gave him a Riza, is now going to run our International Security Advisory Board ogive our government advice on Weapons of Mass Destruction.)
Ah huh.
So what ended up happening at the World Bank anyway? A special subcommittee of the executive board of the bank found late last week that Wolfowitz had in fact broken ethics rules.He has been insisting that he will not resign, even though large numbers of his own employees are openly signing petitions against him.
The management techniques that got Wolfowitz in trouble at the World Bank mirrored those he used at the Pentagon to get up the Iraq war. Without cronyism, tag-teaming, and running circles around opponents of the war such as Secretary of State Colin Powell and CIA Director George Tenet, the pro-war cabal could never have persuaded Bush to launch the conflict or persuaded the American public to support it. State Department officials have complained bitterly about meetings called by Wolfowitz and others on Iraq in 2002, to which some relevant officials were pointedly not invited, or where the agenda was prearranged and rigidly stage-managed so as to ensure that only neoconservative points of view were heard.
Other officials have spoken of being spied on by the neocons at the Department of Defense, to the point where they were reprimanded for cartoons or posters that they had hung on their office doors.
Wow. This is not acceptable.
“Hitler had 98% of the vote. Yes, Hitler was voted into power.
He didn’t jump straight to putting people on trains
and sending them off to the camps.
He evolved his strategy.
First step was to remove those who cried out against his governing style.
Every dissenter was rounded up, quietly, then killed or camped.
How bad would things have to get until you would have done something?
Do they have to license all of our activities?
Do they have to take away ALL your property?
Do they have to throw you on a FEMA train before you say, “Hey! ”
How long before you finally resist and say, “No, I will not comply.”
That from Constitutional Professor Michael Badnarik’s speaking to his class on
World War II and the active role compliance plays in closing an open society:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbNIU2KEz4g